Head Office:
5th Floor Maddox House, 1 Maddox Street, Mayfair, London, W1S 2PZ

Recent Results


20 year long residence – period of imprisonment

The client instructed us to prepare his 20 year route long residence application. We advised that normally this 20 year period would consist of a length of time spent outside of prison. Despite this individual having a one year prison sentence in his 20 year history, we were able to successfully argue that he should be granted Indefinite Leave regardless.

10 year long residence – medical issues

The client instructed us to prepare his 10 year long residence application. The normal appointment for this requires the applicant to have spent no more than 540 days outside of the country in total across the years. This individual had spent 690 days out of the country. There were mitigating circumstances, however, as the individual had medical issues and suffered from depression. They were able to re-enter into the UK on a visit Visa and complete the 10 year application successfully. (KR).

10 year long residence – tax affairs refusal

We applied for a client to obtain “Indefinite Leave to Remain” as a result of remaining in the country for 10 years lawfully. The Home Office refused on grounds relating to his tax affairs whilst he was at T1 general migrant, this was expected. We prepared him thoroughly for the process and successfully challenged the Home Office’s decision. He was granted “Indefinite Leave to Remain” and was overjoyed that he continue his life in the UK.

10 year application – 700 days out of the country

The client instructed us to apply for “Indefinite Leave to Remain” after he was refused a 10 year long residence claim due to being outside of the country for too long. Under the 10 year rule, you would normally need to have spent no more than 540 days outside of the country in the 10 year period, this client had spent over 700 days outside of the country. Although this was his second application we felt confident that we could persuade the Home Office to grant him “Indefinite Leave to Remain”. This was despite the fact that he had spent 700 days outside the country, including a single period spanning over a year outside of the nation. He had a significant medical history which we relied upon to successfully argue for his “Indefinite Leave to Remain”. This required a great deal of hard work and he was incredibly grateful to be able to remain in the UK. (MM)

10 year long residence – diplomatic case

We were instructed by a Kuwaiti national seeking “Indefinite Leave to Remain”. He had remained in the United Kingdom for 10 years on a diplomatic passport as he was working for the local London Embassy. He was well over the 504 day permitted leave, but we were able to argue that his sterling work for the embassy and his promotion of British/Kuwaiti relations showed he was a deserving candidate for “Indefinite Leave to Remain”. The Home Office agreed with our decision and our client was so thankful for the hard work we put in and the fact that he could continue to remain in the UK. (AZ)


Naturalisation – Overstay

We were instructed to pursue a naturalisation application for a client who had recently overstayed his permitted leave by 28 days in the last five years. Whilst this normally would have led to a refusal, we were able to successfully argue that naturalisation was deserved in this case. (RR)


Entrepreneur Visas – Previous Refusals

We represented a client who had been refused an extension of her tier 1 Entrepreneur Visa. She came to us after her second refusal and whilst she was waiting for a third application for an extension to be refused. We noted that the client had a decision which seemed to show confused Home Office thinking but also perhaps some errors on the part of the previous immigration solicitor. We brought in counsel and, after some advice, submitted a pre-action judicial review. The Home Office lawyers at the Government Legal Service, agreed to reconsider the decision, and would not charge a fee to do so. They then granted the application leaving our client and her family overjoyed as they continue their residence in the UK.

Late registration as a director

We represent a client who had been shopping around for a lawyer but was told by other firms that she did not qualify for an extension of her entrepreneur Visa. This was because she had broken the strict rule that required her to have registered as a director of a company within six months of arrival in the UK.

Although this was her accountant’s fault, she was still at risk of losing her extension. We advised her of the risks, but also advised her that she had no other option apart from applying for the extension rather than going home, which she did not wish to do. We made the application with detailed representations and explained what happened with supporting evidence from her accountant. The extension was granted, and the client and her business remain in the UK. They continue to work happily in the UK.


Innovator Visa – Technology Business

A client from the US had an idea of an innovative, scalable and viable business; a Bluetooth chip designed to be embedded into different company assets, like trackers when hired by customers. This will allow the company to track down where their assets are, giving them reassurance. This idea would bridge the gap in different markets especially ones who allow customers and clients to hire and lease their products. The client had already begun informally talking to the endorsers when instructing Westkin. We evaluated the business idea and contacted the appropriate endorsement body. We also provided the client and the endorser guidance on the endorsement process and how to provide the letter. We then gave the endorser advice on how to certify the £50,000 investment. When preparing the client through the process, we went step by step, explaining each stage of the application. This resulted in a successful visa granted by the Home Office.

Innovator Visa – Non Technology Business

We were put into contact with two clients applying for a start-up visa, however, these clients had already secured the endorsement status from their respective endorsement body. The clients were from Argentina & India and had a business idea that would revolutionise how commercial kitchens are used. The idea would provide huge changes to the culinary industry and had a huge untapped market. We were appointed to the case to help these two entrepreneurs secure their visa. We also assisted the clients through every step of the application process, obtaining all the necessary documents and evidence needed. In the end, the visa application was successful, combined with their endorsement, this meant that these two entrepreneurs were ready for business within the UK. They were excited to be able to start their new business in the UK.


Overturning a refusal

An individual approached us as he had been refused a family visit visa previously. As he was from Iran, deemed to be a country of relatively high risk, he wanted to instruct us to get the decision overturned. As with most visit visa refusal letters, the reasoning was weak and very limited. Although it might seem like overkill, we highlighted the deficiencies in a pre-action protocol letter and the decision was reversed within the month. The clients were so happy that they could spend time in the UK with family.

Multiple visit Visa refusals

We represented a Bangladeshi man who had been refused UK visit visas on three separate occasions. He approached us to try one last time to obtain a UK visit visa so that he could visit his sister in the UK as well as spending time with friends who are now based here.

We requested his files from the Home Office which revealed glaring mistakes from the Home Office. They were clearly wrong when they said he had no genuine reason to return; he was involved in the family business and had a wide range of responsibilities. His visa was granted, and he was pleased that he was finally able to spend time with his sister and friends.

False Documents

We represented a Chinese national who had been refused his visit visa before he came to see us. The reason for the refusal was that he had included in his application false documents under the direction of his travel agent. Once we investigated the matter, we noticed that documents were included by the travel agent the client had used in China to attain the visa. We prepared detailed statements from the travel agent; provided a detailed representation about what the previous case precedent had set about dishonesty; and, provided a detailed statement from the client himself. The application was granted. And the Chinese national was then able to visit the UK, allowing him to review schools in the UK for his children. The client was deeply grateful for the work we put in.


Firm’s size

We represented a business who wanted to employ a Tier 2 migrant worker. He had been told by other firms that his company has too small to acquire a sponsorship license. This was because currently he was the only director of the company and it was only him and a part-time secretary, who working out of her garage. We knew that the Home Office would take into account the size of the business, because of our decades of experience, so long as we proved the business was seen as genuine. We were able to do so and gained a license to sponsor the migrant worker. The business owner is still operating and expanding his business. He was thrilled to have this successfully completed.

Hiring migrant workers

We represented a gym in London which sought to hire a business development manager to help grow the membership of the business. Other firms had stated that the case was weak because the individual did not have a specific marketing background, instead he was an influencer on Instagram. We noted the utility of this position as it could gain both increased and revenue for the company.

We showed the Home Office other examples of where lifestyle businesses had used influencers to great success and they were convinced that the vacancy was a genuine one which could only be filled by this individual, the visa was granted and the business continued to grow further.

Reinstatement of Sponsor Licence

A company based in the UK approached us as their licence had been suspended. They had 21 days to provide further information otherwise their licence would be revoked. We noted that the company had unfortunately not been paying the correct rates and hadn’t completed the RLMT properly. After providing a detailed explanation of some of the lapses and putting in place specific assurances and measures to ensure that the same error did not occur. We provided a very detailed bundle of documents to the relevant Home Office team. This led to the sponsor licence being reinstated, to the relief of a very grateful company as well as its migrant staff.


Failure to meet requirements

We represented an Iranian national who wanted to apply for ILR as a Sole Representative. He had remained in the United Kingdom for 5 years, although he hadn’t completed the appropriate requirements. We were able to successfully prove that the reason for this was for a previous curtailment upon entry by the Home Office was unfair. He was grateful when the decision was overturned, and he was granted ILR.


Abusive control but not violence

We represented a lady from Pakistan who had been treated badly by her British husband. Although there was no violence there was a pattern of coercive and controlling behaviour including not allowing the client to leave the house, controlling her money and treating her in a demeaning manner. This case was a challenge as there was no conclusive evidence such as evidence from the police or other authority figures. We took on the case, even though the client had been advised by the lawyers that she didn’t have a good case, and we advised her to obtain statements from people who had seen this behaviour in public places. We also included a note from her GP, which although not including details of any violence, did confirm that she was feeling depressed and unhappy. Not only was her application granted and she felt very relieved to put this very difficult situation behind her, but later on she naturalised as a British national.


Right to Family

We represented a migrant who had obtained a spouse visa based on their marriage to a British national. As the visa was described as a settlement visa, they believed that they did not need to apply for any further extension. Their previous lawyers did not advise them otherwise. When they contacted the Home Office to request a passport, they were told that not only had his visa expired but he had to leave the country. They approached us and we took a sympathetic view and decided to take on the case. We applied and flagged up the inadvertent nature of the mistake and the fact that they had British child. The application was granted, and the clients were so happy they bought us chocolates.


Investor visa extension

We represented an investor visa holder who was seeking an extension. He approached us after having the visa for a number of years. His investments were not readily identifiable ones, so he did not qualify under the rules. Other firms were not taking his case, but we advised him that he had a strong hand so long as he could identify the nature of his investment. We were able to do so, and his extension was granted. He was ecstatic that we were able to provide this extension for him.

Failure to keep cash balance

We represented an Investor Visa client who came up for Indefinite Leave, under the old 1 million system. He was required to show that. aside from the £750,000 invested, he maintained a balance of £250,000 cash in the United Kingdom. He had not done so, but we were able to argue that this was inadvertent and the extension was granted. The client was happy and kept his investments in the UK.


Previous Poor Immigration History

We represented a couple who were same sex, where the migrant, a Bolivian national, had a poor immigration history including Clandestine Entry. Although this could have led to a refusal, we were able to argue the reasons and explain the circumstances of the entire case. This was accepted by the Home Office, who approved their proposed civil partner case, and their subsequent case for civil partnership visa status. They remain in the UK, happy ever since.

Failure to Meet Financial Requirements

We were instructed to help a couple who were seeking a spouse visa for an Indian national, where the British national earned £12,000 per annum, significantly lower than the £18,600 required. As the British National was pregnant, we took on the matter and put forwards the significance of their family on their case. The Home Office accepted our argument. The visa was granted, and the couple were reunited in the UK for the birth of the child.

Immigration Cases

What we're saying



Read All

  • Country Guidance cases in brief: A guide by immigration lawyers for OISC professionals

    This blog is for OISC professionals wishing to have knowledge of the basis of country guidance cases and how to utilise them in preparation of ...

    Read More

  • Post-Brexit Immigration Reforms Threatens UK Video Games Industries

    From old-school classic N64 games, like ‘Golden Eye 007’, to high-speed racers, like ‘Burnout’, and Indie darlings, like ‘Super Meat Boy’, the UK is home ...

    Read More

  • Making an Adult Dependent Relative Application

    Making an Adult Dependent Relative claim under Appendix FM is notoriously difficult.  In 2013 and 2014 the rate for grants, including following reviews by the ...

    Read More

  • What to do if your immigration appeal is lost?

    Whilst it may not be something you wish to consider, there is a possibility that your appeal could be lost at the First-Tier (Immigration and ...

    Read More

  • Tier 1 (Investors) and the end of the million-dollar route

    The current Tier 1 (Investor) route requires applicants to have £2,000,000 and must demonstrate they have held these funds for around two years. Under a ...

    Read More

Paste your AdWords Remarketing code here